Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.messianic,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.messianic,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: Atheism: The Godlessness that Failed
Summary: 
Expires: 
References: <42BA0D7D.8BA17CE5@worldnet.att.net> <1119496406.318315.48560@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <42BA461A.818595CF@worldnet.att.net>
Sender: 
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Keywords: 

In article <42BA461A.818595CF@worldnet.att.net> Roy Jose Lorr <mosestorah@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> 
> 
> Terry Cross wrote:
> 
> > Roy Jose Lorr wrote:
> > > Terry Cross wrote:
> > >
> > > > Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > In article <42B9F143.9EDA2F9F@worldnet.att.net> Roy Jose Lorr <mosestorah@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In article <42B9E495.33D28343@worldnet.att.net> Roy Jose Lorr <mosestorah@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > In article <42B9DA36.FAC55F56@worldnet.att.net> Roy Jose Lorr <mosestorah@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Fascinating, I must say.  What is this absolute proof of the existence
> > > > > > > > > > > of the God of Moses, and how does it differ from those offered for
> > > > > > > > > > > other gods?  The Christian God, say.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Absolute Morality existing in an amoral world ,
> > > > > > > > > > a world which
> > > > > > > > > > makes no provision for it.  Since devising absolutes is beyond
> > > > > > > > > > human capabillitiy,  Absolute Morality could have been placed
> > > > > > > > > > here only by a transendental power.  Most call that power God.
> > > > > > > > > > Absolute Morallity exists in this world in complete form in one
> > > > > > > > > > place only: the Five Books of Moses (Genesis - Deuteronomy)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You mean that thing with the forbidden lobsters and the immoral mixed
> > > > > > > > > fabrics and the obligatory killing of mouthy children and the mandated
> > > > > > > > > slaughter of all conquered citizenry (virgins excepted) and the drowning of
> > > > > > > > > the innocent animals and the holy invasion-landgrabs and the
> > > > > > > > > untrimmable beards and curse laid all childbearers til the
> > > > > > > > > end of time?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > THAT Absolute Morality?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You may be right.  Perhaps no human could come up with such
> > > > > > > > > a moral document after all.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hysteria is good.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > But denial is bad.  Please tell me what parts of Absolute Morality
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >         forbidden lobsters and the immoral mixed
> > > > > > >         fabrics and the obligatory killing of mouthy children and the mandated
> > > > > > >         slaughter of all conquered citizenry (virgins excepted) and the drowning of
> > > > > > >         the innocent animals and the holy invasion-landgrabs and the
> > > > > > >         untrimmable beards and curse laid all childbearers til the
> > > > > > >         end of time?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > we find in the above?  Or do you deny the above are to be found in your
> > > > > > > five Books?
> > > > >
> > > > > > I deny your antagonistic interpretation.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh?  The Hebrews did not invade and steal land from its contemporary inhabitants?
> > > > > They were not rebuked for failing to kill every last inhabitant in certain cases?
> > > > > All women were not cursed to painful childbirth due to Adam and Eve's actions?
> > > > > It was not declared immoral to eat certain foods, wear certain fabrics, even
> > > > > to trim one's beard?
> > > > >
> > > > > You reject my contention that  these things, and more, are to be found in your Five Books
> > > > > of Absolute Morality?  Or you reject the my implication that maybe these things
> > > > > are not so Absolutely Moral after all?   Which?
> > > >
> > > > You have not mentioned divinely sanctioned hereditary slavery - slave
> > > > mother and father, slave children, for all following generations:
> > > >
> > > > Leviticus 25
> > > >    44 Both thy bondmen and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall
> > > > be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy
> > > > bondmen and bondmaids.
> > > >    45 Moreover of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among
> > > > you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you,
> > > > which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession.
> > > >    46 And ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after
> > > > you, to inherit them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for
> > > > ever: but over your brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule
> > > > one over another with rigour.
> > > >
> > > > That is pretty harsh for the paradigm of moral documents.
> > >
> > > In the course of human events slavery is a given.
> >
> > In the course of human events, murder, adultery, homosexuality,
> > bestiality, theft, and lying are also "givens." But those I mention
> 
> > are forbidden, while slavery is recommended by Jehovah.
> 
> All the above save slavery are singular personal acts regardless
> of culture and are dealt with on an individual basis.  Slavery on
> the other hand  is  practiced as a universal communal rite and
> doesn't respond to punishment of individuals as all are guilty at
> once.  The only moral approach is to mitigate the slaves plight.
> This Moses' God did.  Any other solution is impossible.  

This didn't seem to deter God from forbidding trimming of the
beard, even though this practice is nigh universal; very few
men in any given culture look like ZZ Top.  He seemed to
figure He could get away with a universal edict on this
topic.

        {...}


> >
> > I am sorry, Roy, but your statement above leads me to ask whether you
> > consider that Americans are living UNnaturally in the absence of
> > slavery.  What consequence to you consider Europe has suffered over the
> > last thousand years for their refusal to indulge in the "natural"
> > institution of human bondage?
> 
> Neither America, nor Europe, nor the rest of the world free of slavery.

To persist with Terry's question, are the 99% of Americans who
are neither sweat shop owners or brothel keepers behaving unnaturally?
I own no slaves.  I will even gues that you do not either.



